Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 221 SO2D 706 - Dennis v. Prisock

Dennis v. Prisock’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2014

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions

70196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Continental Turpentine & Rosin Co. v. Gulp Naval Stores Co. · Creel v. State. · City of Laurel v. Upton · Whiddon v. Malone · Dennis v. Prisock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any witness is competent to testify who has evidentiary facts within his personal knowledge, gained through any of his senses. A nonprofessional witness may describe personal injuries. Physical pain, weakness, exhaustion and the like are matters one may testify about.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any witness is competent to testify who has evidentiary facts within his personal knowledge, gained through any of his senses. A nonprofessional witness may describe personal injuries. Physical pain, weakness, exhaustion and the like are matters one may testify about. [citations omitted]. * * * * * * We are of the opinion that Mrs. Prisock could testify that she had pain in her back as a result of the collision, that this back condition prevented her from performing her normal activities, and that the pain lasted until she was relieved by an operation. She could testify that her back hurt after an accident, and that there was no additional hurt as a result of a later accident. See Marley Construction Co. v. Westbrook, 234 Miss. 710 , 107 So.2d 104 (1958). 221 So.2d at 710, 711 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.