Crapps v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2000
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Smith v. Illinois · Thomas v. State · Wray v. State · Price v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general rule on this subject is that where one is deprived of an opportunity to cross-examine a witness without fault on his part, ... he may have such testimony previously given on direct examination excluded from the consideration of the jury. ( Id. at 724 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This rule is so thoroughly established in this state that there is little use of pursuing the rule of confrontation of the "faceless informers" outside the authorities of our own jurisdiction. ( 221 So.2d at 723 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.