¶1I concur in the order of reversal and rendition. Appellee may have had the right to disaffirm the contract and recover the money paid by him, had he -acted promptly, Fulcher v. Hall, Tex.Civ.App., 170 S.W.2d 321, but here the period during which the appellee delayed bringing this suit or asserting his rights was unreasonable, as indicated by the facts set forth in the opinion by Mr. Justice Murray, Maverick v. Perez, Tex.Com.App., 228 S.W. 148; 7 Tex.Jur. 949.
221 S.W.2d 579
Reeb v. Danley
Decided April 20, 1949
Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1949-04-20
Relies on Maverick v. Perez · Fulcher v. Hall
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1949-04-20
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1980
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →