Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 A.2d 326 - Parson v. State

Parson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
6
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably State v. Blackstock (1985), Jenkins v. State (1967)

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions

11019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Massiah v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““With respect to the time sequence of the killing, I further charge you that it is not enough that the killing occurred either before or soon or presently after the rape was consummated. There must be such a legal relationship between the two that it can be said that the killing occurred by reason and as a part of the rape, to wit, that the perpetration of the rape had a legal relationship to the killing and was concurrent with it in part, at least, and a part of it in an actual and material sense. Tersely put, death must have been the probable consequence of the unlawful act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “were identical in all individual microscopic characteristics.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.