¶1 The decree in this case is corrected so as to dismiss the bill without prejudice, and, as corrected, will be affirmed. Builders’ Supply Co. v. Harry Smith et al., ante, p. 554,133 So. 721. It is so ordered by the court.
¶2 Corrected and affirmed.
222 Ala. 556
133 So 723
Decided April 2, 1931
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1931-04-02
Relies on Builders' Supply Co. v. Smith
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-04-02
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2002 · most notably Hartt v. Hartt (1956), Ivey v. Dixon Investment Company (1969)
2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The decree in this case is corrected so as to dismiss the bill without prejudice, and, as corrected, will be affirmed. Builders’ Supply Co. v. Harry Smith et al., ante, p. 554,133 So. 721. It is so ordered by the court.
¶2 Corrected and affirmed.