Morrow v. Raper’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"There is no contention by plaintiff that the 1946 judgment was obtained by fraud or collusion. The only contention is that the surveyors made a mistake in establishing the boundary line in that suit. The fact, if true, that the question of the boundary line may have been erroneously determined in the former suit does not impair the conclusiveness of a valid judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, which has not been set aside or corrected on appeal. Tri-County Highway Improvement Dist. v. Vincennes Bridge Co., 170 Ark. 22 , 278 S.W. 627 ; Strauss v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., 188 Ark. 286 , 66 S.W.2d 299 ; 30 Am.Jur., Judgments, Sec. 156; 50 C.J.S. Judgments, § 704."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hastings v. Rose Courts