Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holder v. Fraser, Judge · Eoff v. State · Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Hammon · Mullins v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a thief simultaneously steals two objects, the State may charge him with the theft of one, and under that indictment he cannot be convicted of stealing the other. A plea of double jeopardy would nevertheless bar a second trial for larceny; for there is only one offense, which the State cannot subdivide by making separate accusations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.