Roach v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1994
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hummel v. State · Gerlach v. State · Coffer v. State · Williams v. City of Malvern
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * If appellant was under the impression that the remark made by the court was prejudicial it was his duty to so inform the court and give it an opportunity to make a retraction or explanation to the jury. Roach v. State, 222 Ark. 738 , 262 S.W. 2d 647 (1953).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hulsey v. State“This court has repeatedly recognized and declared that the evidence of other crimes, recent in point of time, and of a similar nature to the offense then being tried, is admissible as bearing on the question of intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kagebein v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.