People v. Sandee’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · United States v. Knights · 63 Cal. 2d 740 - In Re Estrada · Davis v. United States · Davis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“general search condition which allowed authorities to search her 'property' and 'personal effects' without a warrant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Guzman · State v. Lietzau“the specific consent of the authorized possessor of the device”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Guzman · People v. Pride“In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, we defer to the trial court's factual findings which are supported by substantial evidence and independently decide whether the facts of the challenged search and seizure conform to the constitutional standard of reasonableness. [Citation.] Where, as here, the facts are undisputed, we independently review the decision, applying federal law, as well as state law where it does not conflict with federal law, to evaluate the issues involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pride
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.