Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 CONN 591 - Wilson v. Cohen

Wilson v. Cohen’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
2
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Ullmann v. State (1994), Nizzardo v. State Traffic Commission (2002)

81 state decisions

560199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · Bloom v. Illinois · State v. Evans · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · Mayberry v. Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[E]nactments by the General Assembly are presumed to repeal earlier inconsistent ones to the extent that they are in conflict . . . . Because repeal by implication is generally disfavored, however, the principle applies only when the relevant statutes cannot stand together . . . .' Dugas v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co., 217 Conn. 631 , 641 , 587 A.2d 415 (1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““No person shall receive a total effective sentence of more than thirty days imprisonment or a fine in excess of ninety-nine dollars unless he has been afforded the right to a jury trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “long ago concluded that a criminal contempt proceeding should conform as nearly as possible to proceedings in criminal cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.