Perry v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
76 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 651 (§ 451 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · State v. Curcio · United States v. Euge · Hackler v. Langenkamp · Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. Carothers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a decision of a family magistrate may be reversed or modified if clearly erroneous, arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A Family support Magistrate may determine whether or not an obligor is in contempt of the order of the superior court or of a family support magistrate and may make such orders as are provided by law to enforce a support obligation, . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] person who is aggrieved by a final decision of a family support magistrate is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal under this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.