Dodd v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
222 F.2d 175 · 1955
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1972
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4244 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Davis v. United States · Durham v. United States · Hahn v. United States · Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors · Whitney v. Zerbst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ [1] By the court’s acceptance of the pleas of guilty in these circumstances, it resolved the issue of the appellants’ mental capacity to. know and understand the nature of the charge against them and to assist in their defense, and its judgments thereon are not subject to collateral attack. Hahn v. United States, 10 Cir., 178 F.2d 11 ; McMahan v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 150 F.2d 498 ; Srygley v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 264 ; Hall v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 86 F. 2d 820 ; Whitney v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 62 F.2d 970 . Cf. Frame v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 109 F.2d 356 ; Hallowell v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 186 F.2d 873 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.