Campodonico v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
222 F.2d 310 · 1955
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Raymond A. O'COnnOr (1956), The United States of America v. John J. Doyle (1956)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 145
Relies on Holland v. United States · Smith v. United States · United States v. Calderon · Ex Parte Barber · Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We know of no Constitutional, statutory or judicial pronouncement that forbids a busy court from taking ample time to ponder involved and troublesome questions of law and of fact before handing down a decision. Speedy justice does not mean hasty justice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is too well settled to require citation of authority that * * * [gambling] winnings constitute taxable income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.