National Labor Relations Board v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co.’s Empirical Analysis
222 F.2d 341 · 1955
Citation profile
49 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 1997 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. McGahey (1956), National Labor Relations Board v. Camco, Inc. (1965)
49 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on International Ass'n of Machinists; Tool & Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations Board · Local No. 3, United Packinghouse Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. National Paper Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The testimony concerning the altercation indicated that it was a spontaneous affair arising out of a personal argument between Monk and the union representatives. In view of the fact that Monk was immediately disciplined and the notice previously summarized was posted, we are unable to find substantial evidence of the prohibited compulsion. While some employees might be quick to interpret Monk’s act as a company-engendered effort to discourage their organization, we think such a belief would be unreasonable under the circumstances revealed by this record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“There is positive testimony of Mrs. Buckner [Employer] and others that such conduct was not allowed; that Mrs. Buckner severely reprimanded Monk [the supervisor] immediately and laid him off for a week without pay; that a notice to all employees was • immediately posted, informing them that Monk’s act was without authority and on his own volition in violation of specific instructions and that disciplinary action was being taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“deprives his credibility findings of the weight usually afforded them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.