222 F.2d 369
Docket No. 151, Docket 23321.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-03-17
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1964
4 federal appellate ·
2 counsel of record
Relies on United States v. Martel · 126 F. Supp. 91 - American Union Transport, Inc. v. River Plate & Brazil Conferences
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-03-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Anthony S. Falcone, Utica, N. Y., for __ defendants-appellants.
¶2Theodore F. Bowes, U. S. Atty., for Northern Dist. of N. Y., Syracuse, N. Y. (Richard E. Bolton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Troy, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
¶3Before CLARK, Chief Judge, FRANK, Circuit Judge, and GALSTON, District Judge.
¶5Appeal dismissed in open court for want of jurisdiction. 17 F.R.D. 326.