Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 F.2d 371 - Application of Ernie L. Launder and Chester C. Hosmer

Application of Ernie L. Launder and Chester C. Hosmer’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
December 1975
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on In re Bisley · In re Richards · Application of Hall · In re Thompson · Gleason v. Dosch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * *• if the claims fail to adequately define inventive' features by proper limitations, they are not allowable even though the device would support patentable claims.” Application of Launder, supra 222 F.2d at 375-376.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.