Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

222 F.2d 413

Docket No. 12459.

Gordon A. Haugh v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 5, 1955.

Decided May 5, 1955.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-05-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1955

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 145

Relies on Haugh v. Watson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1955-05-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. S. William Cochran, Counsel, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. E. L. Reynolds, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia which dismissed appellants' complaint filed under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C. § 145, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to grant certain claims, which he had denied, of a patent application. Certain other claims were granted by the Commissioner.

¶2

The appellants have made no showing which in our view would justify us in disturbing the findings and conclusions of the District Judge, which for the reasons given in his opinion1 seem to us to be correct.

¶3

Affirmed.

/222/f2d/413 · .json · Public domain