Wilson v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
222 F.2d 692 · 1955
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1998
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Woods v. Interstate Realty Co. · Denison v. Phipps · Fuller v. Allen · Chittim v. Belle Fourche Bentonite Products Co. · Metal Door & Trim Co. v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [W]here a foreign corporation is thus barred from maintaining an action in the courts of a state until it has obtained a certificate of domestication, it cannot maintain an action in the United States Court within the state without having obtained such a certificate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The mere taking of title to [mineral interests and mineral leases] and the passive ownership of it did not constitute engaging in or transacting business in Oklahoma.”) 11 . 71 O.S. § 2(20)(R) [emphasis added]. The insertion of the requirement that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.