Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 F.3d 209 - David Kinder v. Michael a Purdy

David Kinder v. Michael a Purdy’s Empirical Analysis

222 F.3d 209 · 2000

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
October 2020
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Reyes-Requena v. United States (2001), Gilbert v. United States (2011)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

930200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. United States · United States v. Hayman · Wright v. Wright · Insurance Co. of North America v. United States Department of Labor · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not the type of argument that courts have recognized may warrant review under § 2241.” Davis v. United States, No. C/A8:05-2778GRA-BHH, 2006 WL 89505 , at (D.S.C. Jan.12, 2006); see also Kinder v. Purdy, 222 F.3d 209, 213 (5th Cir.2000) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]here the petitioner's case has been viewed [in other circuits] as falling within the savings clause, it was in part because the petitioner arguably was convicted for a nonexistent offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Section 2241 is simply not available to prisoners as a means of challenging a result they previously obtained from a court considering their petition for habeas relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.