United States of America v. Brent Boyd Agnes Cartmell Mark Boyd Albert McAmmond David Beckler George Maziotis Robert Ross Herve Sourati Claire Peck’s Empirical Analysis
222 F.3d 47 · 2000
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably United States v. Canova (2005), United States v. Dickerson (2004)
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. United States · Pinkerton v. United States · United States v. Salameh · United States v. Helmsley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense ... including, in the ease of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In each order of restitution, the court shall order restitution to each victim in the full amount of each victim’s losses as determined by the court and without consideration of the economic circumstances of the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The MVRA definition of `victim' traces verbatim the amended language of the [VWPA], which courts have uniformly read to provide for restitution payable by all convicted co-conspirators in respect of damage suffered by all victims of a conspiracy, regardless of the facts underlying counts of conviction in individual prosecutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.