Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
222 F.3d 943 · 2000
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Sally Beauty Company Inc v. Beautyco Inc (2002), 30 F. App'x 964 - Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. v. Minuteman Intlernational, Inc. (2002)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp. · In re Gartside · Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Co. · SmithKline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corp. · In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when associated with hair care products. Marianna's mark is typed in capital letters in the principal trademark register, which means that the registration covers all design features and is not limited to any special form or lettering. See J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 19:58 (4th ed. & June 2002 database update) [hereinafter McCarthy on Trademarks ] (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“likelihood of confusion between the mark sought to be canceled and a mark for which the party seeking cancellation can establish either prior use or prior registration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`Registrations with typed drawings are not limited to any particular rendition of the mark and, in particular, are not limited to the mark as it is used in commerce.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.