Glover v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The evidence does not demand a finding that the disclaimers would have foreclosed the possibility of a tax refund in some amount, either through litigation or negotiation. There was ample expert evidence to support the jury’s finding that some refund would have been obtained. The amount of the verdict was within that authorized by the evidence. Therefore, the denials of the directed verdict and the motion for j.n.o.v. were proper.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 247 Ga. App. 829 - Goodman v. Glover

2. “The verdict was not authorized, say the appellants, because the “case within the case” legally could not have been successful as the original disclaimers, for several reasons, were void ab initio and could not be resurrected. Therefore, the failure to file for a refund caused no damages, or so the appellants assert.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 247 Ga. App. 829 - Goodman v. Glover