Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Ga. App. 392 - Gray v. Armstrong

222 Ga. App. 392 - Gray v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2019

6 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Federal Insurance v. National Distributing Co. · Taylor v. Murray · Hunter v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the rule of lex loci delicti, tort cases are governed by the substantive law of the state where the tort was committed. Under the rule of lex fori, procedural or remedial questions are governed by the law of the forum, the state in which the action is brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “where the limitation is established as a condition precedent to the action by the statute which creates the cause of action ... the limitation is substantive, not procedural, and is governed by the law of the state where the tort was committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.