Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Ind. 261 - Smith v. Lippman

Smith v. Lippman’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1999

19 state decisions

60194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. · Russell v. Johnson · City of Elkhart v. Minser · Lloyd v. City of Gary · Lindley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[clourts will not assume the duties of ministerial fact-finding bodies, but will only intervene where the ministerial officer or board has acted unlawfully, arbitrarily, or unreasonably.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it would not be good business to repair.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.