Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Kan. 140 - State v. Amodei

State v. Amodei’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
5
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2008 · most notably State v. Richard (1984), State v. Foy (1978)

35 state decisions

2301977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gordon v. United States · State v. Faulkner · State v. Zimmer · State v. Baker · State v. Nix

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the witness is not testifying as an expert his or her testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to such opinions or inferences as the judge finds ( a ) may be rationally based on the perception of the witness and ( b ) are helpful to a clearer understanding of his or her testimony."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““21-3210. Entrapment. A person is not guilty of a crime if his criminal conduct was induced or solicited by a public officer or his agent for the purposes of obtaining evidence to prosecute such person, unless: “(a) The public officer or his agent merely afforded an opportunity or facility for committing the crime in furtherance of a criminal purpose originated by such person or a coconspirator; or “(b) The crime was of a type which is likely to occur and recur in the course of such person’s business, and the public officer or his agent in doing the inducing or soliciting did not mislead such person into believing his conduct to be lawful.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““His state of mind with reference to the case or any of the parties is such that the court determines there is a doubt that he can act impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of any party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.