222 Mich. App. 58 - People v. Ronowski’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause restitution is now mandatory, it is no longer open to negotiation during the plea-bargaining or sentence-bargaining process, and defendants are on notice that restitution will be part of their sentences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Bell“use of the term `shall' rather than `may' indicates mandatory rather than discretionary action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.