Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Minn. 269 - Payne v. Lee

Payne v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
8
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably 106 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Holmes (1982), Green v. Murphy (1958)

3 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

12019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Burke · State Ex Rel. Davis v. Parks · Crawford's Estate · State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of Education · Willis v. Mabon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The principle of impartiality, disinterestedness, and fairness on the part of the judge is as old as the history of courts; in fact, the administration of justice through the mediation of courts is based upon this principle. It is a fundamental idea, running through and pervading the whole system of judicature, and it is the popular acknowledgment of the inviolability of this principle which gives credit, or even toleration, to decrees of judicial tribunals. Actions of courts which disregard this safeguard to litigants would more appropriately be termed the administration of injustice, and their proceedings would be as shocking to our private sense of justice as they would be injurious to the public interest."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.