Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 MISS 23 - Rodgers v. State

Rodgers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hughes v. State · Saucier v. Life & Casualty Ins. · Kellum v. State · Windham v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not only to prove the appellant's guilt beyond every reasonable doubt but to the exclusion of every reasonable hypothesis of his innocence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e have consistently held that where there is a variance between the indictment and the proof as to ownership [of stolen property], objection should be made thereto specifically during the trial, and that it is too late to raise the objection after verdict, and further, that such an objection cannot be raised by a request for a peremptory instruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the secrecy surrounding the handling of the whiskey ... tended just as much to show that the manner of handling and dealing with the whiskey was because it was an illegal commodity as ... because the parties were dealing with stolen property. One theory is just as reasonable as the other... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.