Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Miss. 479 - PERSONS v. Stokes

PERSONS v. Stokes’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 556 So. 2d 303 - McDaniel v. Ritter (1989), Big" 2" Engine Rebuilders v. Freeman (1980)

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1001954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. Watts · T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Mangum · Stovall v. Jepsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t may be stated as a very general proposition that an injury occurs `in the course of' the employment when it takes place within the period of the employment, at a place where the employee reasonably may be in the performance of his duties, and while he is fulfilling those duties or engaged in doing something incidental thereto, or as sometimes stated, where he is engaged in the furtherance of the employer's business. (Citation omitted). An injury is said to arise in the course of the employment when it takes place within the period of the employment, at a place where the employee reasonably may be, and while he is fulfilling his duties or engaged in doing something incidental thereto. (Citation omitted).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a servant steps aside from the master's business for some purpose of his own disconnected with his employment, the relation of master and servant is temporarily suspended and "this is so no matter how short the time, and the master is not liable for his acts during such time." (Emphasis added). ( 222 Miss. at 486 , 76 So.2d at 519 ).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A compensable injury must arise not only within the time and space limits of the employment, but also in the course of an activity related to the employment. An activity is related to the employment if it carries out the employer's purposes or advances his interests directly or indirectly. If a servant steps aside from the master's business for some purpose of his own disconnected from his employment, the relationship of master and servant is temporarily suspended and `this is so no matter how short the time, and the master is not liable for his acts during such time.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.