Reineman v. Larkin’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Spitcaufsky v. Hatten (1944), McDaniel v. Lovelace (1969)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 10 Mo. App. 574 - Menown v. Crawford · Charley v. Kelley · Townsend v. Cox · Richardson v. Schuyler County Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n · Griffin v. Regan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If such infant defendant neglect, for one day after the first day of the term at which he is bound to appear to the suit, to procure the appointment of a guardian to defend the suit, the court shall appoint some competent person to be guardian for such infant in the defense of such suit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““After the commencement of a suit against an infant defendant and the service of process upon him, the suit shall not be prosecuted any further until a guardian for such infant be appointed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“current history, of geographical ... facts, and of facts commonly known to all mankind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barac
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.