Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 NCAPP 562 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fritsch · State v. Etheridge · State v. Barnes · State v. Williams · State v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “apart from the fact that anal intercourse was involved, the acts bore no resemblance to each other, involving different genders, radically different ages, different relationships between the parties, and different types of force”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[P]rior acts are sufficiently similar if there are some unusual facts present in both [act]s that would indicate that the same person committed them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.