Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 NCAPP 585 - State v. Harris

State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co. · State v. Kinch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well-settled that the trial court must submit and instruct the jury on a lesser included offense when, and only when, there is evidence from which the jury could find that [a] defendant committed the lesser included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen the State's evidence is positive as to each element of the crime charged and there is no conflicting evidence relating to any element, the submission of a lesser included offense is not required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.