Sood v. Sood’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goldston v. American Motors Corp. · Anderson v. Assimos · 125 N.C. App. 174 - Wilmington Star-News, Inc. v. New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Inc. · 139 N.C. App. 222 - Brewer v. Brewer · 212 N.C. App. 73 - Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] trial court’s label of a custody order as “temporary” is not dispositive. A custody order is, in fact, temporary if either (1) it is entered without prejudice to either party, (2) it states a clear and specific reconvening time in the order and the time interval between the two hearings was reasonably brief; or (3) the order does not determine all the issues.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“While this provision certainly encourages a judge to recuse [ ] herself in cases where [ ] her 'impartiality may reasonably be questioned' upon [her] own motion, [she is] not required to do so in the absence of a motion by a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]here [an] appellant failed to move that the trial judge recuse himself, he cannot later raise on appeal the judge's alleged bias based on an undesired outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.