Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 NCAPP 807 - Sood v. Sood

Sood v. Sood’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Goldston v. American Motors Corp. · Anderson v. Assimos · 125 N.C. App. 174 - Wilmington Star-News, Inc. v. New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Inc. · 139 N.C. App. 222 - Brewer v. Brewer · 212 N.C. App. 73 - Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] trial court’s label of a custody order as “temporary” is not dispositive. A custody order is, in fact, temporary if either (1) it is entered without prejudice to either party, (2) it states a clear and specific reconvening time in the order and the time interval between the two hearings was reasonably brief; or (3) the order does not determine all the issues.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While this provision certainly encourages a judge to recuse [ ] herself in cases where [ ] her 'impartiality may reasonably be questioned' upon [her] own motion, [she is] not required to do so in the absence of a motion by a party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here [an] appellant failed to move that the trial judge recuse himself, he cannot later raise on appeal the judge's alleged bias based on an undesired outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.