Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Neb. 112 - State v. LaChappell

State v. LaChappell’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2003 · most notably State v. Bey (1988), State v. Dyer (1994)

35 state decisions

180198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In Interest of Durand · State v. Perkins · State v. Joy · State v. Beard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once an individual in custody indicates in any manner, at any time prior to or during questioning, that he or she wishes to remain silent, interrogation must cease, for at this point the individual being interrogated has shown that he or she intends to exercise his or her fifth amendment right to remain silent. [Citations omitted.] Moreover, once the right to remain silent has been invoked, there is a strong presumption against its subsequent waiver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Probable cause to seize an individual exists at the moment the collective knowledge and trustworthy information of all the police officers engaged in a common investigation are such as to warrant a conclusion by a prudent person that the individual seized committed a felony. ... It is not required that an officer see the commission of the felony____””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.