222 N.J. Super. 191 - Grant v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Hennessey v. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co. (1992), 280 N.J. Super. 47 - Peranio v. Peranio (1995)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Kozlowski v. Kozlowski · State v. Profaci · Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and Dispensary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“forbids a course of alarming conduct or repeated acts committed with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy the victim. In short, the leitmotif which runs throughout the sections is a prohibition against conduct of some consequence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a person commits a[n] ... offense if, with purpose to harass another, he: (a) Makes, or causes to be made, a communication ... anonymously or at extremely inconvenient hours, or in offensively coarse language or any other manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court shall consider but not be limited to the following factors: (1) The previous history of domestic violence between the cohabitants including threats, harassment and physical abuse; ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.