Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 NJSUPER 92 - State v. Lefurge

State v. Lefurge’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2019

4 state decisions

301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · United States v. MacDonald · Pollard v. United States · United States v. Loud Hawk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failure to assert the right [to a speedy trial] will make it difficult for a defendant to prove that he was denied a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is insufficient to constitute meaningful prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.