Kendall v. CURL’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2000
2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An underlying principle of the law of the highway is that all those lawfully using the highway, or land adjacent to it, must show mutual respect and forbearance. The motorists must put up with the farmer’s cattle: the farmer must endure the motorist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If cattle and horses have a right to be on the road, their owner is not negligent in allowing them on the road.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carrow Co. v. Lusby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.