222 Or. App. 362 - State v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"The principle underlying Terry and Caldwell , however, dictates that Riggs [ v. State , 50 Or.App. 109 , 622 P.2d 327 (1981) ] and [ State v. ] Guzman [ 140 Or.App. 347 , 914 P.2d 1120 (1996) ] must now be overruled. If a trial court has jurisdiction over a case in which the defendant is accused by an indictment that does not allege any crime, surely the court has jurisdiction over a case in which the defendant is accused of a crime that differs from the crime of conviction. The underlying principle-a defect in the indictment is not a jurisdictional error-applies with at least equal force, if not more force, in the latter situation. * * * Neither any statute nor the Oregon or United States constitutions divests a circuit court of jurisdiction based on a defective indictment."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 462 - State v. Murga