Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 PASUPER 190 - Commonwealth v. Bell

Commonwealth v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 1990
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1990

6 state decisions

40197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth ex rel. Bleecher v. Rundle · Commonwealth ex rel. Huey v. Dye · Commonwealth ex rel. Houser v. Seip · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Aronson v. Price · Commonwealth ex rel. Osburn v. Haas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “f the prisoner or his counsel shall state that he or they desire to test the legality of his arrest, the judge of such court of record shall fix a reasonable time to be allowed him within which to apply for a writ of habeas corpus.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.