Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

222 Pa. Super. 385

Commonwealth v. Rothman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1972

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1972-09-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1975

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Con cubbing Opinion by

Spaulding, J.:

¶2I agree with the result reached by the majority under the circumstances of this case. I would, however, like to add my belief that the judge’s suggestion of compromise between the parties’ positions would, standing alone, constitute prohibited judicial participation in the plea negotiations. Here, however, the potential coercive effect of this participation was remedied by the judge’s indicating that if appellant chose to withdraw from the plea arrangement he could be tried before a different judge.

¶3I therefore concur in affirming the order of the court below.

Hoffman, J., joins in this opinion.
/222/pasuper/385 · .json · Public domain