Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

222 So. 2d 440

Herron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1969-05-13

Relies on Fote v. Reitano

Decided 1969-05-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1The defendant, Robert Herron, is appealing a judgment of conviction and sentence entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of the unlawful sale of marijuana.

¶2The sole point presented for our determination on appeal is whether there was sufficient, competent substantial evidence to support the verdict and the adjudication and sentence for the crime of unlawful sale of marijuana.

¶3We have carefully reviewed the record! and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict and the court’s adjudication and sentence. Sealey v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 894.

¶4No reversible error appearing, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

¶5Affirmed.

/222/so2d/440 · .json · Public domain