Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 So. 3d 58 - State v. Lamizana

222 So. 3d 58 - State v. Lamizana’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · State v. Kemp · 803 So. 2d 131 - State v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “discern whether the testimony of [the investigator] or the records relating to her interview would undermine the credibility of the victims' testimony and, if so, the extent to which the absence of [the investigator's] testimony or records relating to her interview contributed to the verdict,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “undermines our confidence in the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.