222 So. 3d 867 - Schiff v. Pollard’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc. · 843 So. 2d 1049 - Burguieres v. Pollingue · Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light · 68 So. 3d 1099 - Favrot v. Favrot · Avenue Plaza, LLC v. Falgoust
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a second action is precluded by res judicata when all of the following elements are satisfied: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of the final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit arose out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The specific relief granted must be apparent on the face of the judgment without reference to an extrinsic source such as pleadings or reasons for judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.