222 So. 3d 908 - State v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Oliveaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any variance from the procedures required by this Article which does not affect substantial rights of the accused shall not invalidate the plea.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The trial court heard the testimony of the alleged victim and found probable cause to hold defendant. Prior to the start of trial, the State amended the bill of information to reflect a date range in May 2014, and the defendant pled not guilty to the amended bill. The State also nolle prossed a misdemeanor charge of aggravated assault pending against defendant in case no. 14-3525. This Court has previously held that when the trial judge states that the defendant is sentenced to the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that this sentence be run concurrent with any parole revocation that [defendant] may be facing. Understand that I don't control your parole revocation, but it is my intention that this be concurrent with your parole revocation, if your actual parole is revoked .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.