Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 SW2D 359 - Thomas v. Milfelt

Thomas v. Milfelt’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2017

8 state decisions

4019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Filbrun v. Ivers · Holland v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no evidence whatsoever to show that plaintiff, during the period when these transactions ... were happening, made any objections concerning defendant's method of keeping account of the partnership affairs, and it was not until after the dissolution of the partnership that plaintiff made any complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.