Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 S.W.3d 610 - State v. Callaghan

State v. Callaghan’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 177th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Weeks v. United States · Hudson v. Michigan · Wilson v. Arkansas · Richards v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]uppression of the evidence is not an available remedy for violations of the `knock and announce' rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3109”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.