Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 TENN 121 - Doe v. Sides

Doe v. Sides’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt · Schleif v. Hardware Dealer's Mutual Fire Insurance · Harbison v. Briggs Bros. Paint Mfg. Co. · Rodgers v. Danko · Hodgson v. John Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the Virginia Uninsured Motorists Statute, as construed by Virginia Courts, a John Doe action is an action ex delicto and judgment must first be rendered against the unknown or hit-and-run driver before the action may proceed against the insurance company. Rodgers v. Danko, 204 Va. 140 , 129 S.E.2d 828 ; O’Brien v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 3 Cir., 372 F.2d 335 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.