Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2006
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robinson v. State of California · Cummings v. The State of Missouri · 59 Cal. 2d 247 - Department of Mental Hygiene v. Hawley · Marsh v. Henderson · State ex rel. Bricker v. Griffith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he general principal of the application of the doctrine of laches to the State may be subject to further consideration in a case strongly calling for it “We know of no rule of sovereignty or divinity which hedges a tax suit with immunity from the rules of equity and practice which control other suits.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.