Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 222 Va. 766 - Evans v. Commonwealth

Evans v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2004 · most notably Stockton v. Commonwealth (1984), Watkins v. Commonwealth (1985)

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

310198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Commonwealth · Stamper v. Commonwealth · Kirkpatrick v. Commonwealth · Von Byrd v. Texas · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Liepelt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In assessing the penalty of any person convicted of an offense for which the death penalty may be imposed, a sentence of death shall not be imposed unless the court or jury shall (1) after consideration of the past criminal record of convictions of the defendant, find that there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing serious threat to society or that his conduct in committing the offense for which he stands charged was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman in that it involved torture, depravity of mind or an aggravated battery to the victim; and (2) recommend that the penalty of death be imposed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.