222 Wis. 2d 233 - State v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Desist v. United States · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State · 90 Wis. 2d 97 - Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp. · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan · 135 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Friedrich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. This subsection does not exclude the evidence when offered for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davidson“As far as plan or motive, like I say, the defendant has a good point on that. Quite simply, that if you get to the incident happening at all, plan or motive is no longer a serious issue. That's the way I see the case, at this point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Davidson“[t]he opportunity [to accomplish the assault] was created through [the defendant's] plan or through his method of sexually assaulting these young girls. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davidson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.